|
|
The Twelver-Imam Mahdism theory was a complicated theory
comprising of belief in the existence of the twelfth Imam: ‘Muhammad
bin Hassan Askari’ and in his being the Awaited Mahdi. It admits that
Imam Hassan Askari did not openly declare that he has a son. The
theory rather, claims that, he hid him in secret due to the fear of
Abbasid authorities, that he would overthrow their thrones, and due to
that, they were searching for him to kill him, while still in the
cradle.
Serious academic research on the inception of this theory however,
reveals the existence of a long time interval between the two parts of
the theory. As it was in the beginning, centered around the existence
of a son for Imam Askari, who inherits the Imamate from him. But it
later turned out to be belief in his being the Awaited and occult
Mahdi. The theory found in the ‘Occultation of the Mahdi’, an
interpretation of the non-declaration of his birth by his father, and
his non-appearance after that.
In order to confirm the truth of this theory that plays a
very great role in the history of Islam, and in shaping of the Twelver-Imam
Shiite political thought, it is necessary to dissect the different
components of this theory, and study each in depth and objectively. We
would have firstly to find out: Was the Shiite Mahdism theory before
the middle of the third (3rd) century of Hijrah, clearly
known and restricted to the person of the twelfth Imam- Muhammad bin
Hassan Askari, or it was ambiguous and a general abstract idea.
A-
THE AMBIGUITY SURROUNDING THE IDENTITY OF THE MAHDI FROM AHL
AL-BAYT
The history of the Imams from the household of the Prophet (Ahl
al-Bayt) (peace be upon them), and their traditions being preserved by
Imamate Shiite heritage, confirm the ambiguity surrounding the
identity of Imam Mahdi and the non-declaration of his name or the time
of his appearance. This was not due to the fear of the then
authorities, but due to its not being specified beforehand. This was
because Mahdism was initially mere idea and hope, hovering over the
head of any one of them. This hope came to the fore when Imam Ali
became the Caliph, and it became more intense after the murder of Imam
Hussain bin Ali in Karbala. That was the time when many Shiites
started preparing for revenge, and the overthrow of the Umayyad regime
through armed revolt. The people were gathering around this or other
Imam of the Ahl al-Bayt, with Mahdism being attributed to him. He will
proclaim that and succeed, or die due to his proclamation and
appearance. Some will then say, he has gone into hiding and
occultation, and he will reappear in future.
If the identity of the Mahdi
has been outlined previously, since the time of Messenger of Allah
(peace be upon him) and the Shiites have reached consensus regarding
it, they would not have gone to the left and to the right, and they
would not have been perplexed, asking the Imams on the identity of the
Mahdi.
Imam Muhammad bin Ali Baqir
while addressing the Shiites said: “ You never cease looking towards
one of us, saying: “ He is the one!” then he returns to his Lord, till
the time when Allah will raise for this affair, one about whom you do
not know whether he has been born or not, whether he has been created
or not!” (1)
Kulayni says: Hakam bin Abi
Na’im once came to Imam Baqir in Madinah and said to him: “ I have
taken an oath between Rukn and Maqam (two holiest parts of the Ka’bah
in Makkah) that if I meet you, I will not leave Madinah until I know
whether you are the Qa’im of the family of the Prophet or not. “
Imam Baqir said to him: “ O Hakam, all of us
stand by the commands of Allah”
Hakam however, was not satisfied with this
general response, so he asked him specifically:
“Are you the Mahdi?” Baqir replied again in a
general sense:“All of us guide to Allah” So Hakam asked more
specifically and clearly:
“ Are you the owner of the sword and the one who
inherited it?” For the third time the Imam responded vaguely:
“ All of us are owners of the swords, who inherited
them.”
Hakam then asked (demanding) more clarity: “
Are you the one to kill to enemies of Allah?” Imam Baqir replied:
“O Hakam! How can I be the one, when I am 45 years
of age? While the owner of this affair is closer to the time of
breast-feeding than me, and lighter when he rides on the back of an
animal.” (2)]
Kulayni and Nu’mani both say: “That Imam
Sadiq did not like identifying the person of the Mahdi. Abu Hamzah one
of his companions once asked him:
“ Are you the owner of this affair?” He replied: “
No.” He then said: “What about your son? “He said: “No.” He also said:
“Is your grandchild the one?” He replied, “No.” Then he said: “Is he
your great grandchild?” He replied!”No”. He (hakam) said at last “Then
who is he?” He replied: “The one who will fill the world with justice
as it was filled with injustice and tyranny, after the interval of
Imams, as the Messenger of Allah was raised after the interval of
Messengers (peace be upon them).” (3)
Supporting this is the fact that when Imam
Sadiq convinced the poet Sayyid al-Himyari, who believed in Muhammad
bin Hanafiyyah being the Mahdi, when he convinced him of his death, he
did not specify for him who is the Mahdi. Al-Himyari said some poetic
verses recording his transformation from the belief in the Mahdism of
Ibn Hanafiyyah. But he did not mention the identity of the Mahdi: The
meaning of the poetry is as follows:
“ My prolonged statements on the son of Khaulah was
not in opposition, from my side, to the pure lineage. But what was
reported from the inheritor of Muhammad (peace be upon him), and what
he said cannot be falsified. That the owner of the affair will be
lost, not being seen and concealed, like the fearful one, watching
(people’s movements). The wealth of the lost will be distributed, as
if his loss was in the grave. When it was reported that the son of
Khaulah was lost (in occultation), we accepted it and went on speaking
on it. We said he is the Mahdi and the Qa’im, in whose justice all
will live. If you say no, your statement is the truth, and what I have
been instructed is inevitable, without any prejudice. I testify to my
Lord, that your statement is the evidence on all the people, the
obedient and the disobedient. The owner of the affair and the Qa’im,
whom I longed for delightfully, will go into occultation inevitably,
may Allah bless him while in occultation. He remains (in it) for some
time and then appear at other times and he will rule over the East and
the West. This is my religions belief in secret and in the open, I
will not mind even if I am blamed on it.”
Although Imam Sadiq, in an earlier report did
not deny the possibility of his being the Qa’im as he did not
emphasize it, Saduq reports from Ibn Abi Ja’far that he heard Sadiq
saying: “ Woe onto the tyrants of the Arabs of a matter that has drawn
closer.” He also reports from Sadir, and he from Abu Abdullah that he
said: “ O Sadir, stay at your home, not leaving it and stay for days
and nights. When it reaches you that Sufyan has appeared, come to us,
even if on your feet.” (4) This reveals that Imam Sadiq was telling
his companions of the imminence of his appearance. Muhammad bin Hassan
Saffar however, reports in ‘Basair al-Darajat’ from Abu Basir that he
one day came to Abu Abdullah and said to him:
-
“May I be your ransom, I would like to touch your chest.” (Abu
Basir was a blind man). He replied him:
-
“ Do it”. He said: I torched his chest and his shoulders. He
said, “Why this, O father of Muhammad?” Abu Basir said: “ May I be
your ransom…I heard your father saying that the shoulders of the Qa’im
are a bit down, spacious and broad between them.” Imam Sadiq then
said:“O father of Muhammad, My father wore the shield of the Messenger
of Allah (peace be upon him) and it did not fit him…. I also wore it
and it was this and that…. It will be worn by the Qa'im, and it would
be as it was with the Messenger of Allah tight and fit, as if he
raised its two sides by two rings. The owner of this affair will not
be one, over forty (40) years of age. (5)
Tusi reports in ‘Al-Ghaybah’ a dialogue conducted
between Imam Sadiq and Abu Basir, who asked him “Has this affair a
long period (before being accomplished) so we relax ourselves till it
comes?” The Imam said to him: “ Yes, but you revealed the secret and
spread it, so Allah increased (the period).” He reports another
tradition, with more direct bearing and clarity, where the Imam Sadiq
said: “This affair was in me, but Allah delayed it, and He will do
what He wishes in my progeny after that.” (6) This shows that the hope
of Mahdism was on Imam Sadiq during his time. Due to this, when he
died and the circumstances were not ripe for him to achieve his
desired hope (ambition) the one inherent in the hearts of the Shiites,
some of his followers, some of those very close to him, denied and
rejected the news of his death, insisting that he went into
occultation, and that he will appear very soon. They said: He was the
Awaited Mahdi. The leader of such people was the leader of Shiites in
Basrah: Abdullah bin Nawus.
THE HOPE OF KADHIM BEING
THE MAHDI
With the intensity of the Abbasid political
pressure on Imam Musa bin Ja’far Kadhim, the hope of Shiites who
believed in his Imamate, increased as to his declaration and revolt
leading to a rebellion against the Abbasid rule. Most of the Shiites
believed seriously that Musa was the Qa’im and the Mahdi. They
reported many traditions from Baqir and Sadiq in identifying his
person. They might have added to it many things from their sides,
based on their eagerness, love and suffering.
When Imam Kadhim died after thirty-five years of
waiting and hope, the general Musawite Shiite populace did not believe
the story of his death. They insisted on believing in his occultation,
and his being alive and confirming that he was the Awaited Mahdi, who
will appear and fill the earth with justice and fairness as it has
been filled with injustice and tyranny
RIDA DENIES THE
LIKELIHOOD OF HIS BEING THE MAHDI
That hope of (the Mahdi) returned to the Shiites
after about twenty (20) years. That was when the Abbasid caliph Ma’mun
called on Imam Ali bin Musa Rida, in the year 200 A.H. to Khurasan,
and he appointed his as the Crown Prince in the year 201 A. H. This
revived the hope in the minds of the Shiites and led them to the
belief in the possibility of Rida becoming the Awaited Mahdi.
Kulayni reports in ‘Al-Kafi’ that Ayub bin Nuh went
to Imam Rida and said to him. “ I hope that you will be the owner of
this affair, and that Allah may bring it to you without the use of
sword. You have already received oath of allegiance, and money have
been minted with your name (on it).” Imam Rida however shattered his
expectations and rejected being the Mahdi. (7)
When the poet Da’bal al-Khuza’i came to Imam Rida
and recited a well-known poem: “ Schools of verses not being recited,
and the house of revelation without premises”, he pointed to the Mahdi
in an ambiguous manner. He said: “ The Imam has emerged. It was
necessary for him to emerge, based on the name of Allah and His
blessings. He distinguishes for us between the truth and falsehood. He
rewarded for favours and calamities.” He did not mention him by name.
The identification of Imam Mahdi with the twelfth
Imam of the Ahl al-Bayt, as it is known by the Twelver-Imam Shiites
today, took place in a later date long after the death of Imam Hassan
Askari, and the claim of his having a son in secret, in the beginning
of the fourth century of Hijrah approximately. This happened after the
development of the theory of ‘divine’ Imamate and its transformation
from infinite number to limiting them to only twelve (12), so that the
sect will be a Twelver-Imam (sect).
Sheikh Saduq has mentioned in ‘Ikmal al-Din’, which
he wrote in the middle of the fourth century of Hijrah, a big number
of traditions from the Noble Prophet (peace be upon him), and from the
Imams of the Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them). Some of them point to
the Qa’im or the Mahdi without specifying his name and the name of his
father. Some of them emphasized and specified his position, as the
twelfth (Imam), and that he is the son of Hassan Askari. As it came in
another report that says that: Imam Rida asked the poet ‘Da’bal Al-Khuza’i’,
after he has recited his poem in which he pointed to the Mahdi in an
ambiguous manner. He said to him: “Do you know who will be that Imam?
And when will he appear?” He replied: “ No, my master, except that I
heard of the emergence of an Imam from among you (Ahl al- Bayt) who
will purify the world of mischief and corruption, and fill it with
justice as it was filled with injustice.” He said to him: “ O Da’bal,
the Imam after me will be Muhammad, after Muhammad his son Ali, after
Ali his son Hassan, and after Hassan his son, the Evidence, the
Awaited Qa’im” in his Occultation whose obedience is mandatory at the
time of his appearance.” (8)
These reports are weak traditions both in their
chains of transmission and in their contents, for they cannot
withstand academic investigation. We will discuss them in the chapter
on the critique of the traditional (special) evidence, and its
unsoundness will be established subsequently.
B – THE MAHDISM
PHENOMENON IN ISLAMIC HISTORY
The several and frequent claims of being the Mahdi,
extending to tens of such claims here and there, are what further
confirm the ambiguity associated with the identity of the Mahdi among
the members of the Prophet’s household. This even led to each sect or
group to have more than one Mahdi. This phenomenon shows that the term
‘Mahdi’ because synonymous with revolt, freedom and justice and its
re-emergence again in corrupt circumstances shows that the Muslim
world is degenerating, day in day out.
Most of the stories of Mahdism in the early Islamic
generations were connected to revolutionary political movements that
confront injustice and persecution and gathered around one of the
leaders, mostly being one of the Imams of the Ahl al-Bayt (peace be
upon them). When such movements fail and the Imam dies before he
emerges (as a political leader), or is killed in the confrontation, or
hides in obscure circumstances, his followers used to differ. Among
them will be those who will submit to and accept the reality, and
start searching for another new Imam and a new occasion for revolt.
Some of them will not submit to the reality and will not accept
defeat, and will be quick at believing in hearsays, which have it
that, the revolting Imam has fled and has hidden himself and has gone
into occultation. It is usually the simple-minded people who fixed
their hopes on a person, exaggerating his attributes. So it becomes
very difficult for them to change their minds, for that will mean a
failure and total breakdown.
THE MAHDISM OF IMAM ALI
The supporters of Imam Ali bin Abi Talib (peace be
upon him) who revolted against the Umayyad rule, and fought in the
Battle of the Camel and fought Muawiyah in the Battle of Siffin, who
also confronted the Kharijites in Nahrawan, were pinning their hopes
in the rule of the Imam, during which they will enjoy justice and
equity. Their hope in the Imam was very high. That was why some of
them were shocked by the news of his assassination. They could not
believe the news of his (untimely) death.
Shiite historians like Nubakhti, Ash’ari al-Qummi,
Al-Kashi were saying that: ‘A group of Shiites did not accept the
death of the Imam and they claimed that: ‘Ali was not killed nor did
he die, and that he will never be killed, nor will be die, till he
chases the Arabs with his stick and fill the earth with justice and
equity, as it has been filled with injustice and tyranny.’ (9)
We can interpret this statement of the Mahdism of
Imam Ali and his Occultation, as due to shock of the death, its sudden
nature, as well as very high hope…This was because those people, were
living very far away from Kufah could not bear the news of the
Martyrdom of the Imam, after their hope in him, to establish universal
justice on earth. This led to the acceptance of ideas contrary to the
reality.
THE MAHDISM OF IBN
HANAFIYYAH
After the massacre of Karbala Shiite fury gathered around
the leadership of Muhammad bin Hanafiyyah, the brother of Imam Hussain
for the purpose of revenge and retaliation for the martyrs of Karbala…
When Muhammad bin Hanafiyyah died in obscure circumstances in the year
81 A.H, a group of his supporters –Kissanites-said that: ‘He did not
die and that he was staying in the Ridwi mountains between Makkah and
Madinah. They believed that he was the Imam, the Awaited Mahdi who was
predicted by the Prophet (peace be upon him), who will fill the earth
with justice and equity. (10).
Sayyid Murtada Alam al-Huda interpreted the claims of the
Kissanites on the Mahdism of Ibn Hanafiyyah as perplexity, which made
them resort to it. (11)
Perhaps perplexity and confusion was their lot, because
they have pinned their hopes on Ibn Hanafiyyah to wrestle power from
the Umayyads’ hands. They were disappointed when the desired goal was
not achieved. His followers from among the Kissanite Shiites were
forced to invent a doctrine on his Mahdism, and the perpetuation of
his life and his occultation in their attempt to preserve the hope
ignited in their hearts. Moreso that the Shiites in those days were
aware of any predetermined particular personality as the ‘Awaited
Mahdi’.
THE MAHDISM OF ABU HASHIM
Support for the belief in the Mahdism of Ibn Hanafiyyah
declined with the emergence of Abu Hashim Abdullah bin Muhammad bin
Hannafiyyah, as a new leader for the Shiites towards the close of the
first century of Hijrah. Great hopes were pinned on him for attaining
what his father was unable to attain… The crisis was repeated when Abu
Hashim died without appearing (as the Mahdi)… This led to the belief
of some Shiites in his hiding and occultation and saying that he was
the Awaited Mahdi, and that he is alive and has not died. (12)
As for those who admitted the death of Abu Hashim, they
preserved their hopes in their hearts, by waiting for the emergence of
one of the children of Muhammad bin Hanafiyyah in the future. They did
not specify any particular person. (13)
THE MAHDISM OF AL-TAYYAR
The Shiites who formed the main opposition group to the
Umayyad rule, immediately gathered around a new leader from the Ahl
al-Bayt, i.e. Abdullah bin Mu’awiyah bin Abdullah bin Jafar Al-Tayyar,
who succeeded in establishing a Shiite state in Isfahan at the end of
the Umayyad rule. He was, however defeated later, and was killed in
obscure circumstances. Some of the Shiites could not bear the news of
the collapse of the Shiite state. They claimed that Al-Tayyar was
alive and has not died, and that he was staying in the Mountains of
Isfahan, that he wouldl never die till he hands over the reins of
affairs to a man from Banu Hashim, of the children of Ali and Fatimahh.
(14)
CONFINING MAHDISM TO THE
FATIMIDE FAMILY
The Shiite theory of Mahdism was not confined to the
Fatimide family in the beginning, as the Kissanites-representing a
stage in the development of Shiism-limited it to the household of Ali
(Alawites), seeing possible in Muhammad bin Hanafiyyah and his
children: or they limited it to them, but it extended to others
outside their fold, like Abdullah bin Mu’awiyah bin Abdullah bin
Ja’far al-Tayyar. It later developed and became confined only to the
Fatimide family, in the children of Hassan and Hussain. At that time
it was not confined to anyone of the two households. Due to this a
group of Shiites believed in the Mahdism of Zayd bin Ali. And another
group believed in the Mahdism of Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Hassan bin
Hassan (Dhu al-Nafs al-Zakiyyah).
As Zayd was killed after little while, his followers went
to Dhu al-Nafs al-Zakiyyah, Abdullah bin Hassan, his father has named
him Muhammad and predicted at the time of his birth that he will be
the promised Mahdi, who was foretold by the Prophet (peace be upon
him) and has said on himregarding him, “His name is like my name, and
the name of his father is like the name of my father”, as was
popularly known in that period.
THE MAHDISM OF DHU AL-NAFS
AL-ZAKIYYAH
Dhu al-Nafs Al-Zakiyyah hoped to rebel against the Umayyad
rule, when the children of Hashim paid their allegiance to him at Abwa.
Among them were, Ibrahim al-Imam, Saffah and Mansur. But it did not
take long that the Abbasid rule was established, so those who paid
allegiance to him deserted him, and another group of Shiites flocked
around him. He left Madinah in the year 145 A.H and took over Makkah
and Yemen, but he was killed after few months. Due to this a section
of his followers were shocked and could not bear the news of the
defeat, and did not believe the murder of the Mahdi, whose appearance
they were waiting since very long time. They said that: ‘He was alive
and did not die, nor was he killed, but was staying on the Mount of ‘Ilmiyyah’-between
Makkah and Najd-till the time he will reappear. They held onto the
Hadith of the prophet (peace be upon him), which says: “The Qa’im (Mahdi’s)
name is like my name and his father’s name is like my father’s.” (15)
As there were no explicit, specific and well-known Hadiths,
which explain the identity of the Mahdi, the followers of Dhu al-Nafs
al-Zakiyyah have explained the Hadiths of Mahdism as referring to him,
and have interpreted the Hadiths related to (the Mahdi) to also refer
to him. They might have even fabricated some reports and attributed
them to the Prophet (peace be upon him), in order to augment their
theory and to support their Awaited Leader.
THE MAHDISM OF BAQIR
Some reports state that: ‘A section of the Shiites
believed in the Mahdism of Imam Muhammad bin Ali Baqir (peace be upon
him) depending on a report which says that: ‘The prophet (peace be
upon him) said to Jabir bin Abdullah al-Ansari: “ You will meet him,
so say my ‘Salam’ to him.” (16)
Kulayni says in ‘Al-Kafi’: ‘Imam Baqir used to
confine to his companions that the emergence (of the Mahdi) and his
appearance were imminent, and he advised them to maintain it as a
secret. Some of them abandon all they were doing waiting for the time
of the blowing of (the siren)’. (17)
THE MAHDISM OF SADIQ
After the death of Imam Baqir and the defeat of Muhammad
bin Abdullah Dhu al-Nafs al-Zakiyyah, and the triumph of the Abbasids,
and the popularity of Imam Jafar bin Muhammad Sadiq (peace be upon
him), reports became widespread on his Mahdism. (18)
Nubakhti reports that: ‘Some Shiites have reported from
Imam Sadiq that he said: “If you see my head rolling to you from the
mountain, you should not believe that, for I am your ‘Sahib’ (Mahdi).”
And he also said: “If anyone informs you that he nursed me, washed my
body (after death) and shrouded me, do not believe him, I am your
companion (Sahib) and the companion of the sword.” (19) Hence a
section of the supporters of Imam Sadiq denied admitting that he died.
They also said that: “He is the Awaited Mahdi and that he is alive and
did not die.” This group was known as the ‘Tawussites –attributed to
Ajlan bin Tawus. (20) Among these group was Aban bin Uthman Al-Ahmar
considered by al-Kashi to be one of the menof consensus (Ijma’), i.e.
one of the closest people to Imam Sadiq. (21)
THE MAHDISM OF ISMA’IL
From the above, it seams that the various Mahdism theories
were born with time and in different circumstances. They were more of
hopes than dependence on clear and sound Hadiths. The belief in the
Occultation evolves when an Imam dies before his appearance (as the
Mahdi). The Shiites have never ever agreed on the Mahdism of a
particular Imam previously, and ithas been the same from the
beginning. At the time when some of them believed in the Mahdism of
Imam Sadiq, some of them were fixing their hopes on the Mahdism of his
son Isma’il. When Isma’il died during the lifetime of his father Imam
Sadiq, his supporters denied his death, and invented a doctrine in his
Occultation. They interpreted his funeral and burial by Imam Sadiq
openly, as a drama aimed at concealing the fact that Isma’il has fled
and has hid himself, as a preparation for his reappearance in the
future! (22)
It is well known that the Shiites differed after the death
of Imam Sadiq into six (6) different sects. The Isma’ilites believed
in the life of Ismail, as well as his Imamate, Mahdism and
occultation. Some of them after their despair in his Mahdism turned to
accept the Mahdism of his son Muhammad. They then transferred Mahdism
to the children of Isma’il till the appearance of the last of them, at
the close of the third (3rd) century when he established
the Fatimide rule in North Africa.
THE MAHDISM OF DIBAJ
Muhammad bin Jafar Sadiq (Al-Dibaj) who appeared in Makkah in the year
200 A.H., claimed that he was the Awaited Mahdi. He declared himself
as the Caliph of the Muslims and took oath of allegiance from them,
and was called the Leader of the faithful. (23)
Therefore, we can say that the theory of Mahdism meant,
emergence, revolt,… and was never specific in a particular person.The
theory of occultation used to evolve whenever any awaited Imam fails
or dies without achieving his goals.
THE MAHDISM OF MUHAMMAD
BIN ABDULLAH AL-AFTAH
The only exceptional case, which was contrary to the
above- mentioned rule at that time, was the theory of the Mahdism of
‘Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Jafar Sadiq’. This person was not born at
all and did not exist. Some of the Fathite Shiites invented a story of
his existence in secret, after the death of his father Abdullah Aftah,
who was believed by those Shiites to be the Imam after his father
Sadiq. Those Shiites were shocked when Aftah died without an issue to
succeed him in the Imamate. They believed in the necessity of the
continuation of the Imamate in the children and the grand children (of
the Imam), i.e. being inherited vertically. Due to this they could not
shift to the belief in the Imamate of the brother of Abdullah, Musa
bin Jafar. They therefore invented the idea of the existence of a son
for him in secret: They said that: “His name corresponds to the famous
Prophetic Hadith: His name is my name, the name of his father is the
name of my father.” (24)
It cannot be ruled out that some people of vested interest
and hypocrites from among the companions of the Imams might have
fabricated this illusory story of the myth of the awaited Mahdi-Muhammad
bin Abdullah bin Sadiq, so as to benefit from that financially, and
claim being his deputy and receive money on his behalf. The stories on
the existence of that illusory Mahdi were widespread in Yemen. And
that he will appear, and fill the earth with justice and equity after
it has filled with injustice and tyranny.
THE MAHDISM OF KADHIM
With the Abbasid revolution and its deviation from its
goals of reform and the spread of corruption in their rule, it was
only natural that their opponents gathered around any great
personality from the Ahl al-Bayt, i.e. Imam Musa bin Ja’far Kadhim
(peace be upon him) who was a symbol of piety, knowledge and devotion.
The hope of his emergence and appearance (as the Mahdi) grew. In this
way there were a lot of reports on the Mahdism of Imam Kadhim, and the
belief that he was the Qa’im from the family of Muhammad (peace be
upon him). Some of the Shiites went on reporting some narrations from
Sadiq that: “It was inevitable that my son is the Qa’im (Mahdi) of
this Ummah, and the Owner of the sword”. And “Musa is the Qa’im, and
this is inevitable from Allah”. “Even if his head will roll to you
from the mountains you should not believe, for he is the Qa’im” “The
name of the Qa’im is the iron (knife) of the barber.” “As if I am
seeing the black banner with a green patch on it lowered over the head
of this person sitting” and the rest of such reports that lack
consensus!
When Rashid arrested Imam Kadhim, many of the Shiites
considered that as the first or minor Occultation. When he killed him
and threw his pure body on the bridge in Baghdad, they refused
accepting that or believing it, and they said, ‘It was an Abbasid
drama’ and they said also that: ‘Imam Kadhim has gone into his second
Occultation, and that he fled from the prison and he was alive and did
not and will not die till he controls the East and the West of the
world, and fill the whole of it with justice as it was filled with
injustice, and that he was the Qa’im and the Mahdi.” (25)
Most of the children of the Imam claimed the same thing,
so also most of his close companions like Al-Mufaddal bin Umar, Dawud
al-Ruqa, Daris al-Kinani, Abu Basir, A’yun bin Abdul Rahman bin A’yun,
Hadid al-Sabati and Hassan bin Qiyyama al-Sirafi. Ali bin Abi Hamiza
wrote a book on the occultation. Similarly Ali bin Umar al- A’raj
wrote another book on that.
Those Shiites were known as the Waqifites i.e. those who
accepted the Imamate of Imam Kadhim, and refused faith in Ali bin Musa
Rida.
Dawud al-Ruqa hesitated in admitting the Imamate of Rida,
based on those agreed reports, which limited Mahdism to Kadhim and say
that: “The seventh of us, is our Qa’im.” Imam Rida said to him, “The
hope of the rising (appearance) of Kadhim depends on the will of Allah
and it was not inevitable.” (26)
The Waqifites continued in their faith in the Mahdism and
the occultation of Imam Kadhim for a long time. But they decreased in
number with the passage of time, till the death of the theory and the
extinction of those who believe in it, especially when Imam Rida
confirmed the death of his father and said to them: “Allah’s evidence
on His creation will be only through the Imam that is alive, and is
well-known. Glory be to Allah. The Messenger of Allah died and Musa
bin Ja’far did not die? Yes, by Allah he has died, and his wealth has
been distributed and his slavegirls have been married.” He suspected
those who claim that he did not die, of lying and said: “They are
disbelievers in what Allah the Exalted has revealed on Muhammad (peace
be upon him). If Allah exalted were to extend the lifespan of anyone
due to the need of the creation to him, He would have extended the
lifespan of the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him).” (27)
THE MAHDISM OF MUHAMMAD BIN
QASIM
In the beginning of the third (3rd) century of
Hijrah, in the year 219 A.H and during the days of the Caliphate of
Mu’tasim, an Alawite rebellion took place in ‘Taliqan’ under the
leadership of Muhammad bin Qasim. Mu’tasim however defeated and
arrested him and carried him to Baghdad, detaining him in his place.
He was able to run away and fled. The people differed on his affairs.
Some of them said that: ‘He has died or fled’. Some of the Shiites
said that: ‘He is alive and he will reappear and he is the Mahdi of
this Ummah’. (28)
THE MAHDISM OF YAHYA BIN
UMAR
Another Alawite Imam, namely, Yahya bin Umar marched out
from Kufah in the days of Musta’in. He directed Hussain bin Isma’il to
him, and he killed him. But some of his companions did not accept the
news that he was defeated, and said that: ‘He was not killed, he only
hid himself, and went into occultation, and that he was the Mahdi and
the Qa’im, who will reappear another time’. (29)
THE MAHDISM OF MUHAMMAD
BIN ALI HADI AND ASKARI
The Imamate Shiites differed among themselves in the
middle of the third century of Hijrah on the identity of the Awaited
Imam Mahdi. A section of them said that: He is Muhammad bin Ali Hadi,
who died suddenly in Dajil. They believed in his occultation, like
that of Isma’il bin Ja’far. They did not believe his death. Another
section of them claimed that Imam Hassan Askari was the Mahdi. A third
section of them believed in the existence and the Mahdism of a son for
him (Askari) in secret, namely, Imam Muhammad bin Hassan Askari. Yet
others said that: ‘He (the Mahdi) is not specified, and that he will
be one of the members of the Ahl al- Bayt, not by appointment, and
that he will be born and will appear in future.” (30)
THE MAHDISM OF AN UNKNOWN
QA’IM
At last, two Shiite historians contemporaneous to the
death of Imam Askari mentioned that: ‘A sect from the followers of the
Imam said: “Hassan bin Ali has died, a confirmed death, and the
Imamate has ceased till the time when Allah will raise a Qa’im from
the family of Muhammad (peace be upon him) that have passed away. If
He wills, He raises another person other than him, but from his
forefathers. That is because the raising of the Qa’im and the
appearance of the Mahdi is inevitable. The appearance of the Mahdi is
on Allah. The reports came on the basis of that, so also sound
narrations and a consensus of the Ummah. It is not possible to
invalidate that. This is due to the fact that, the death of Hassan bin
Ali has been confirmed, as his not leaving an issue has also been
confirmed. So the Imamate has ceased, as he has no issue. Since it is
not possible except in the children (of the Imam). It cannot go to
the uncle or cousin or brother after Hassan and Hussain. The Imamate
has thus ceased till the raising of the Qa’im from among them. If he
appears and emerges (as the Mahdi) (his affairs) will continue till
the Hour of judgment. (31)
All these several and conflicting claims of Mahdism
movements express and show the ambiguity and vagueness of the concept
of Imam Mahdi, and the likelihood of his being any of the Imams from
the Ahl al-Bayt. That is the one who will appear with the sword, and
establish the state and rule of truth. All the Shiite sects believed
that he is from this Hashimite family, or that house of Alawites or
Fatimide or Hassanite or Hussainite or Musawite house. And that he is
this or that person. If the identity of the Mahdi has been determined
before, , since the time of the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him)
or the time of the previous eleven Imams, the Muslims would not have
differed, nor would the Shiites, nor the Imamate Shiites, not the
supporters of Imam Hassan Askari in determining the identity of the
Mahdi. Some of them would not have believed ‘Imam Hassan Askari’
himself to be the Mahdi.
We conclude from all these that: The identity of the Mahdi
was vague and not specific or determined in the time of Ahl al-Bayt.
That the belief of his being the son of Hassan Askari evolved after
supposing his existence in secret, and in an attempt to explain his
absence from sight, and the non announcement of his birth by his
father, on the basis of considering occultation as (an essential)
attribute of the Mahdi.
REFERENCES
-
Saduq: Ikmal al-Din, p. 183
-
Kulayni: Al-Kafi, vol. 1 p. 536
-
ibid. Vol. 1 p. 341, Numani: Al-Ghaybah p. 187
-
Saduq: Ikamal al-Din, p. 35
-
ibid. p. 189
-
ibid. p. 263
-
Al-Kafi. Vol. 1 p. 341, Saduq: Ikmal al-Din, p.
370
-
Saduq: Ikmal al-Din, p. 373
-
Nubakhti: Firaq al-Shi’ah,p. 22, Saad bin
Abdullah al-Ashari al-Qummi: Al-Maqalat was al-Firaq . p. 20 Al-Kashi:
Marifah al-Naqilin an al-A’imah al-Sadiqin. P. 101
-
Nubakhti: Firaq al- Shiah p. 34 al-Ashari: Al-Maqalat.
P. 27
-
Al- Shafi, p. 184
-
Nubakhti: Firaq al-Shiah. P. 34, al- Ashari: Al-Maqalat
-
as in 12
-
Nubakhti: Firaq al-Shiah . p. 35, Al-Ashari: Al-Maqalat
p. 35
-
Nubakhti: Firaq al-Shiah. P. 62, Al-Ashari: Al-Maqalat.
P. 76
-
Al-Isfirayini: Al-Farq bain al-Firaq. P. 60
-
Kulayni: Raudah Al-Kafi. P. 245
-
Kulayni: Al-Kafi : Al-Raudah. P. 290
-
Nubakhti: op. cit. p. 67
-
ibid., Al-Ashari. P. 79
-
Al-Kashi: Ikhtiyar Ma’rifah al-Rijal
-
Nubakhti p. 68, Al-Ashari, p. 80
-
As in 22
-
Al-Ashari p. 88
-
Nubakhti, p. 80, Al-Ashari, p. 89
-
Al-Nuri al-Tabrisi Khatimah Mustadrak Wasait al-Shiah
vol. 3 p. 595
-
Al-Kashi: Ma’rifat al-Rijal. P. 379
-
Al-Isfahani: Maqatil al-Talibiyyin p. 577 Al-Isfirayini:
Al-Farq bayn al-Firaq p. 31
-
Al-Kamil of Ibn Al-Athir, vol. 7,p. 43, Muruj al-Dhahab
of Mas’udi, vol. 4, p. 147
-
See Nubakhti: Firaq al-Shi’ah ,m p. 93,96,98 and
105, Al-Ashari al-Qummi: Al-Maqalat wa al-Firaq,p.101, 106, 107,108.
-
Nubakhti: Firaq al-Shiah, p105, Al-Ashari: Al-Maqalat.
P. 108
|